by Emily Boster
Goal: Design and install two similar flat fielding screens with mounting gear for the Texas A&M Physics and Astronomy Teaching Observatory.
Jean-Philippe Rheault, Don W. Carona
Texas A&M had designed larger flat fielding screens for certain Chilean observatories in rectangular shape using frame components from ITEM
. For simplicity, it was decided that square
frames would be used for the Texas A&M flat fielding screens. These would be constructed from ITEM Basic Elements" Profile 6 30X30 light. The length of the sides of the squares were chosen in proportion to the size of the
diameter of the respective telescope that each screen would accompany.
For the 16 inch telescope, a 22 inch screen was chosen. For the 20 inch telescope, a 26 inch screen was chosen. These dimensions were chosen primarily because these sizes allow for images to be taken without too great of precision
in positioning the telescope. They were chosen also in consideration of the screen material that was available. Using an existing flat fielding screen in the lab, these sizes could be cut out and a new screen would not have to be
ordered. The frames were ordered in September, 2010 and received in October, 2010.
Solidworks images of the 22 inch square frame constructed out of ITEM profile 6 30X30 light.
Mounting Gear Design
The mounting gear for the flat fielding screens was designed in such a way as to utilize existing parts that could be ordered from McMaster.com
. After taking measurements at the observatory, the original idea was to develop a system of permanent adjuster mounts that would be hooked onto the side of the dome. The screen with mounting gear would be attached onto this adjuster, and would be easily removable.
This design was altered over the course of the project, with the final design retaining the key elements of the original concept; that is, a partially permanent mounting apparatus, while features were added to make adjustment of the screen simple. These features include the following:
with rod ends (attached to lower part of screen for outward pitch);
attached to dome at lower part of screen;
attached to (two) hooks (top part of screen to allow for curvature of dome);
Custom Attachment Blocks
to hold rod ends to respective surface;
Image of the finalized solidworks model of the assembly.
Turnbuckle, Rod Ends, Attachment Blocks, Single Hook.
This assembly will be used for both flat fielding screens. A complete parts list can be found below:
Part sizes and configurations were determined though direct measurement of the domes, solidworks measurements of actual-size model of domes, and part availability. McMaster solidworks files were used for the assembly. They can be accessed below:
Rod End Left Thread
Rod End Right Thread
Custom parts were made to fit McMaster parts.
After measurements were taken of the domes, Solidworks models were built to depict the area where the screen would be mounted and to take additional measurements from. All of the following images and information is from the 18.5
Once the respective sizes for each frame were chosen, measurements were made to determine how large the mounting gear would
have to be, and what pitch angle was needed in order for the screen to be normal to the line of sight of the telescope.
A sketch on the plane bisecting the dome proved that the screen would have to be pitched from the bottom to be normal to the line of sight from the telescope.
The 30.25 inch line is the distance from the top pipering to the bottom pipering. The line that is at 59.2 degrees from the
horizontal is parallel to the telescope's face, or normal to the line of sight. A small amount of rotation is needed to correct the screen, about 3 degrees.
Note: the 24 inch rectangle depicts the screen with mounting gear.
Custom parts were made to comply with purchased parts. There were 14 total for both assemblies. These can be viewed in the parts list document. The parts were made in the AIG machine shop. Rick Allen and Emily Boster did the
fabrication and machine work.
When the frame assemblies were ready, they were taken out to the observatory, and tested. The frames attached as designed, but it became apparent that the large hinge hooks would not be sufficient. The curvature of the dome along
with the weight of the assembly caused the hooks to sit at an angle on the pipe ring-not fully grasping it. This problem could be fixed by elongating the end of the hook so that even at an angle, the hook would still grasp the
pipe ring, or by hooking onto the pipe ring backwards. After consideration, it was determined that the most efficient thing to do was to place the hooks backwards on the pipe ring, utilizing the dome wall as a support mechanism
to hold the hooks in place and prevent any movement.